Is it better to have various different kinds of pension pots or is there a tangible, economic benefit to amalgamating them?

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Author Posts
Anonymous User Participant

I have several different pensions, one frozen from 1995, one private personal pension managed by myself through an investment platform), one 18-year pension managed by trustees (defined/guaranteed final sum) and one ongoing pension with my current employer (maxed out contributions to leverage most from my employer contributions). Is it better or worse to leave them all alone to do their own thing so as to diversify the benefits come retirement in the next few years?

Richard Berry Participant

You should be very careful when moving old pensions just in case, as you say they come with additional benefits in case you lose them. You will need to talk to a professional advisor beforehand. You also need to consider if moving to a cheaper pension provider will compensate for any exit fees you need to pay.

Alex Pugh, Chartered Financial Planner, Partner at Saltus gave this advice:

Consolidating pensions can offer benefits such as reduced paperwork, increased income flexibility, reduced fees, a wider range of investments, and it’s easier to ensure your investments are aligned with your goals. Usually, simplicity is best. However, defined benefit schemes are valuable. Transferring these are high-risk and should only be considered in specific circumstances. Multiple defined contribution schemes can sometimes reduce diversification, because many default funds have similar holdings. Older pensions may have unique benefits, including extra tax-free cash and could incur exit penalties. Transferring could have adverse consequences as well as positive ones. Taking advice prior to consolidating is recommended.

Ben Keymaster

It depends on your goals. Keeping multiple pension pots can give flexibility and different investment options, but consolidating can simplify management, reduce fees, and make it easier to track growth. The economic benefit often comes from lower charges and more streamlined planning, but check for any exit fees or lost benefits before merging.

mariiamdelgar Participant

Having multiple pensions can actually work in your favor, as they naturally provide diversification in terms of risk, management style, and guarantees. Leaving them to continue as they are can make sense, especially if some have guaranteed benefits or are performing well without intervention. However, it’s also worth reviewing each one individually: for example, your self-managed personal pension may benefit from a periodic check to ensure the investment mix still aligns with your risk tolerance and retirement goals. Similarly, understanding any fees or charges on the older or frozen pensions could highlight opportunities for efficiency. Overall, keeping them diversified while occasionally reviewing performance and alignment with your retirement timeline is often a balanced approach.

mariiamdelgar Participant

Having multiple different pension pots can actually be advantageous, as it naturally provides diversification in terms of investment strategies, risk levels, and potential benefits. For example, defined benefit schemes offer guaranteed payouts, while personal or self-managed pensions allow more control over investment choices. Amalgamating pensions can simplify management and reduce paperwork, and in some cases may lower fees if the receiving scheme has cheaper administration or investment costs. However, consolidating can also mean losing certain guarantees or benefits tied to specific pensions, so the economic advantage isn’t always clear-cut. Overall, a balanced approach is often best: review each pension individually, consider fees, guarantees, and investment options, and then decide if combining them aligns with your retirement goals.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.